Image-localized biopsy mapping of brain tumor heterogeneity: A single-center study protocol.

Brain cancers pose a novel set of difficulties due to the limited accessibility of human brain tumor tissue. For this reason, clinical decision-making relies heavily on MR imaging interpretation, yet the mapping between MRI features and underlying biology remains ambiguous. Standard (clinical) tissue sampling fails to capture the full heterogeneity of the disease. Biopsies are required to obtain a pathological diagnosis and are predominantly taken from the tumor core, which often has different traits to the surrounding invasive tumor that typically leads to recurrent disease. One approach to solving this issue is to characterize the spatial heterogeneity of molecular, genetic, and cellular features of glioma through the intraoperative collection of multiple image-localized biopsy samples paired with multi-parametric MRIs. We have adopted this approach and are currently actively enrolling patients for our 'Image-Based Mapping of Brain Tumors' study. Patients are eligible for this research study (IRB #16-002424) if they are 18 years or older and undergoing surgical intervention for a brain lesion. Once identified, candidate patients receive dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) perfusion MRI and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), in addition to standard sequences (T1, T1Gd, T2, T2-FLAIR) at their presurgical scan. During surgery, sample anatomical locations are tracked using neuronavigation. The collected specimens from this research study are used to capture the intra-tumoral heterogeneity across brain tumors including quantification of genetic aberrations through whole-exome and RNA sequencing as well as other tissue analysis techniques. To date, these data (made available through a public portal) have been used to generate, test, and validate predictive regional maps of the spatial distribution of tumor cell density and/or treatment-related key genetic marker status to identify biopsy and/or treatment targets based on insight from the entire tumor makeup. This type of methodology, when delivered within clinically feasible time frames, has the potential to further inform medical decision-making by improving surgical intervention, radiation, and targeted drug therapy for patients with glioma.

Image-based models of T-cell distribution identify a clinically meaningful response to a dendritic cell vaccine in patients with glioblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma is an extraordinarily heterogeneous tumor, yet the current treatment paradigm is a "one size fits all" approach. Hundreds of glioblastoma clinical trials have been deemed failures because they did not extend median survival, but these cohorts are comprised of patients with diverse tumors. Current methods of assessing treatment efficacy fail to fully account for this heterogeneity. METHODS: Using an image-based modeling approach, we predicted T-cell abundance from serial MRIs of patients enrolled in the dendritic cell (DC) vaccine clinical trial. T-cell predictions were quantified in both the contrast-enhancing and non-enhancing regions of the imageable tumor, and changes over time were assessed. RESULTS: A subset of patients in a DC vaccine clinical trial, who had previously gone undetected, were identified as treatment responsive and benefited from prolonged survival. A mere two months after initial vaccine administration, responsive patients had a decrease in model-predicted T-cells within the contrast-enhancing region, with a simultaneous increase in the T2/FLAIR region. CONCLUSIONS: In a field that has yet to see breakthrough therapies, these results highlight the value of machine learning in enhancing clinical trial assessment, improving our ability to prospectively prognosticate patient outcomes, and advancing the pursuit towards individualized medicine.

Weakly Supervised Skull Stripping of Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Brain Tumor Patients.

Automatic brain tumor segmentation is particularly challenging on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with marked pathologies, such as brain tumors, which usually cause large displacement, abnormal appearance, and deformation of brain tissue. Despite an abundance of previous literature on learning-based methodologies for MRI segmentation, few works have focused on tackling MRI skull stripping of brain tumor patient data. This gap in literature can be associated with the lack of publicly available data (due to concerns about patient identification) and the labor-intensive nature of generating ground truth labels for model training. In this retrospective study, we assessed the performance of Dense-Vnet in skull stripping brain tumor patient MRI trained on our large multi-institutional brain tumor patient dataset. Our data included pretreatment MRI of 668 patients from our in-house institutional review board-approved multi-institutional brain tumor repository. Because of the absence of ground truth, we used imperfect automatically generated training labels using SPM12 software. We trained the network using common MRI sequences in oncology: T1-weighted with gadolinium contrast, T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, or both. We measured model performance against 30 independent brain tumor test cases with available manual brain masks. All images were harmonized for voxel spacing and volumetric dimensions before model training. Model training was performed using the modularly structured deep learning platform NiftyNet that is tailored toward simplifying medical image analysis. Our proposed approach showed the success of a weakly supervised deep learning approach in MRI brain extraction even in the presence of pathology. Our best model achieved an average Dice score, sensitivity, and specificity of, respectively, 94.5, 96.4, and 98.5% on the multi-institutional independent brain tumor test set. To further contextualize our results within existing literature on healthy brain segmentation, we tested the model against healthy subjects from the benchmark LBPA40 dataset. For this dataset, the model achieved an average Dice score, sensitivity, and specificity of 96.2, 96.6, and 99.2%, which are, although comparable to other publications, slightly lower than the performance of models trained on healthy patients. We associate this drop in performance with the use of brain tumor data for model training and its influence on brain appearance.